Know where your brand stands in AI answers.

Track AI appearances, source citations, competitors, and visibility across the questions your customers are already asking.

getvisibly.app/dashboard
Dashboard
Overall visibility
45/100
↑2 ptsthis week
59%Coverage
#2.3Avg. rank
1Missed
Visibility by engine
OpenAIChatGPT15PerplexityPerplexity40ClaudeClaude85GeminiGemini33GoogleGoogle AIO53
0%50%100%May 28Jun 3Jun 20
OpenAIChatGPT4/18
15/100
PerplexityPerplexity14/18
40/100
ClaudeClaude17/18
85/100
GeminiGemini6/18
33/100
GoogleGoogle AIO13/18
53/100
Top source-proof gap High impactPerplexity
“best project management software for product teams”
CompetitorAsana Source proof
Your brandClickUp Missing

Asana is backed by G2, Reddit, and Capterra.

Competitors mentioned by AIView competitors
BrandShare
Asana18%
monday.com14%
Notion12%
ClickUp9%
Trello7%

Your next customer is asking AI, not Google.

They ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews what to buy. Visibly shows when your brand appears in the answer, when source proof exists, and when a competitor takes your place.

  • 5AI engines, one score

    ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, tracked side by side on every prompt.

  • 24hto your baseline

    Your first full scan lands within a day of signup. From there, daily scans record every move.

  • 100%of findings carry receipts

    Every citation links to the stored AI answer it came from, with source URLs when engines return them.

You're losing customers you'll never see.

When someone asks ChatGPT for the best project management tool, they don't see ten blue links. They see one answer with three brands mentioned. If you're not one of those three, you don't exist, and you won't even see the lost click in your analytics.

01No referrer. No UTM. No idea you were ever considered.
02Each AI engine ranks you differently, and the rankings update weekly.
03A single content tweak can move you from invisible to mentioned first.
Qwhat's the best project management software for a 40-person startup?
ChatGPTChatGPT· mentioned 3 brands · source proof captured · 4.2s

For a team of 40, three tools consistently lead reviews on capability and price. Asana1 handles cross-team workflows at scale with strong reporting. Fieldwork2 is well-suited to product-led startups, offering tighter Slack/Linear integration and faster onboarding. Notion3 works if your team prefers documents and databases over project boards.

Sources the engine drew on1 g2.com2 fieldwork.com/customers3 capterra.com
You're Fieldwork. Mentioned 2nd of 3.Visibly's brief for this prompt targets position 1.
#2 → #1

Every AI answer, tracked. What to write, for which prompt, on which engine.

See every AI appearance, on every enabled engine, every day.

Paid monitoring runs your prompts through enabled engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and Google AI Overviews. You get one visibility score per engine, one overall, plus the answer text we got back.

68visibility
ChatGPTChatGPT73+6
PerplexityPerplexity61+3
ClaudeClaude70+9
Gemini68-2
updated 4 min ago·80 prompts / day

Find the prompts you should be winning but aren't.

A coverage matrix shows you, at a glance, which prompts you own and which your competitors have all to themselves. Filter to opportunities and missing gaps.

Coverage matrix3 opportunities
project management software
~
team collaboration tool
~~
task tracker for teams
~
best PM software for startups
kanban board software
~~~
agile project management
~~

Track up to 25 competitors head-to-head.

Twelve-week share-of-voice charts. Per-brand answer-share breakdowns across enabled engines. See who's appearing in your category and exactly where you're losing ground.

Share of voice · 12 weeks
closing on Asana, about 6 weeks to overtake
02550W10W14W18W21
Asana34%
Fieldwork28%
Notion22%

Specific writeups, not generic SEO advice.

For every missed appearance, we generate a content angle, the prompt it targets, projected score lift, and any reference sources AI engines cited instead. Mark done as you ship.

Next fix · highest impactHIGH
+8 score
projected visibility score33,100 searches/mo
Targeting"agile project management"
Suggested pieceAcme vs Jira vs Linear: Agile Project Management Compared (2026)
Missed on
ChatGPTChatGPTGemini

Ask why the number moved. Get the evidence, not a guess.

The built-in analyst answers in plain language and shows the rows behind every claim: which engine lost points, which citation disappeared, which competitor took it. When there's an obvious next step, it proposes the action and waits for you to confirm.

Analysthigh confidence
Why did my score drop this week?

You lost 4 points, and Perplexity accounts for most of it. Two prompts stopped citing you once g2.com replaced your page as the source, and Asana picked up both.

64visibility score-4
PerplexityPerplexity-3 pts
ChatGPTChatGPT-2 pts
ClaudeClaude+1 pts
citation lostg2.com4× → 0
Track 3 prompts Perplexity now answers for your category?
crm with built-in callinghubspot alternative for 10 seatscrm that syncs with quickbooks
Plan usage: 3 of 75 prompts

Not just whether you're mentioned. Why, who appears instead, what source proof shaped the answer, and whether your fix moved it.

AEO readiness score

Schema markup, structured data, entity linking. See what's missing before AI does.

Technical audit · acme.com2 issues found
robots.txt allows AI crawlers
llms.txt missing
Structured data valid
~Brand entity linking
Homepage speed

See which sources AI cites

For search-grounded engines like Perplexity, we capture the exact domains cited for your prompts, so you know who to out-publish.

Sources cited instead of youPerplexityPerplexity
g2.com
34%
capterra.com
22%
techcrunch.com
17%
reddit.com
14%
forbes.com
9%
acme.comyou
4%

Connect visibility with branded search

Connect Search Console to spot the weeks when branded demand and AI visibility move together, and the weeks they pull apart. Then investigate the citation gaps behind the signal.

Visibility × branded search Search Console synced
205080AprMayJunJul
AI visibility score68+14
Branded clicks / wk2.4k+23%

Every gap, at a glance

Prompt × engine matrix shows visibility rate per cell. Gaps surface instantly.

Prompt coverageOverall 52%
CRM tools6 kw
Pipeline4 kw
Automation3 kw
Contacts2 kw
Avg
ChatGPTChatGPT
83
67
50
33
58
PerplexityPerplexity
100
67
75
50
73
ClaudeClaude
50
33
0
33
29
Gemini
67
50
25
0
36
Google AIO
83
50
50
67
63
Coverage
100%
gap (no citations)

Briefs your writer can't argue with

Every brief is built from the citations we actually captured, and each claim has to carry a typed, verified source before it reaches the writer.

Brief · "best crm for small teams"1 open
Seat pricing vs. the 3 cited rivalsblocking · g2.com
Median setup time, with sample sizeblocking · docs.acme.com
~Migration effort for HubSpot teamsimportant · needs a source
6 sections · 4 cited sourcesOpen brief

Ship the change, then prove it worked

We prepare the exact edit for the page, you approve it, and we check it landed. Fourteen days later the prompt is rescanned against its baseline, so a win is a measurement, not a claim.

Change set · /blog/crm-comparisonapproved
replaceintro paragraph verified on page
insertcomparison table, after §2 verified on page
Rescan · 14 days after publishing
PerplexityPerplexity#7 → #2+12score after the fix
What a won citation looks like
ChatGPTChatGPTlive answer · web search on

what's the best project management software for a 40-person startup?

Try Fieldwork first. Its cross-team reporting leads reviews at this size.

Sources1 g2.com2 fieldwork.com/customers3 capterra.com

Fieldwork, 60 days of briefs later: visibility 38 → 61, cited #1 on this prompt.

Three steps. Baseline in 24 hours.

  1. minute 0

    Connect your brand

    Add your domain and prompts. Baselining starts the moment you sign up.

    Setup acme.com connected
    best CRM for startupssales pipeline tool+ 13 more
    minute 0

    Connect your brand

    Add your domain and prompts. Baselining starts the moment you sign up.

    Setup acme.com connected
    best CRM for startupssales pipeline tool+ 13 more
  2. every 24 hours

    We monitor every AI engine

    Your prompts run daily. Each answer is scored for appearance, position and sentiment.

    best CRM for startupsdaily · 07:00 UTC
    ChatGPTChatGPT#2
    PerplexityPerplexity#1
    ClaudeClaude
    Gemini×
    Google AIO#3
    every 24 hours

    We monitor every AI engine

    Your prompts run daily. Each answer is scored for appearance, position and sentiment.

    best CRM for startupsdaily · 07:00 UTC
    ChatGPTChatGPT#2
    PerplexityPerplexity#1
    ClaudeClaude
    Gemini×
    Google AIO#3
  3. hour 24

    Get a brief for every gap

    A specific content angle, the prompt it targets, and the sources cited instead of you.

    Content brief+8 projected
    Acme vs HubSpot vs Pipedrive: Best CRM for Startups (2026)Targets the Gemini gap on “best CRM for startups”Open brief
    hour 24

    Get a brief for every gap

    A specific content angle, the prompt it targets, and the sources cited instead of you.

    Content brief+8 projected
    Acme vs HubSpot vs Pipedrive: Best CRM for Startups (2026)Targets the Gemini gap on “best CRM for startups”Open brief

Find your gaps free. Fix them from $89/mo.

Starter7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Know where you stand across every AI engine.
$89/mo
or $890/yr · save $178
25 prompts
10 competitors
All 5 AI engines, scanned daily
1 brand workspace
200 Analyst questions / mo
10 content briefs & recommendation runs / mo
30 live refreshes / mo
Start free trial
MOST POPULAR
Pro
Turn gaps into published wins, and prove the lift.
$189/mo
or $1,890/yr · save $378
75 prompts
25 competitors
All 5 AI engines, scanned daily
3 client workspaces
600 Analyst questions / mo
150 content briefs & recommendation runs / mo
150 live refreshes / mo
Published-URL impact rescan
Weekly digest & alerts
Get started
Scale
Maximum coverage and limits for high-volume teams.
$399/mo
or $3,990/yr · save $798
200 prompts
50 competitors
All 5 AI engines, scanned daily
Unlimited client workspaces
1,500 Analyst questions / mo
500 content briefs & recommendation runs / mo
400 live refreshes / mo
Published-URL impact rescan
Weekly digest & alerts
Get started
7-day free trial on Starter Team invites with roles on every plan Cancel anytime No setup fees

A few things people ask before signing up.

Yes, fundamentally. SEO optimizes for which links appear on a results page. GEO optimizes for which brands an AI engine names in a generated answer. The signals overlap (clean content, structured comparisons, third-party citations) but the targets diverge: AI engines weight things like brand co-occurrence, structured data, and source freshness very differently than Google's ranking algorithm.

Free scans check Perplexity and ChatGPT. Paid monitoring tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews when those integrations are enabled for your plan.

We use each provider's official API only. We never inject prompts that pretend to be users. Every query is plainly a programmatic request.

For each prompt we score AI appearance × position, on each enabled engine, then weight by search volume. Source citations are tracked separately when an engine returns URL evidence.

You see your baseline score within 24 hours of signup. Content fixes typically take 2-4 weeks to affect AI appearances after you ship them, as engines re-crawl your pages.

Yes. Cancel from your billing portal and you'll keep access until the end of your current billing period. No further charges, no data retention.

Does AI mention you? Find out in 60 seconds.

Add your domain. The free scan checks Perplexity + ChatGPT; paid monitoring tracks more engines and shows the queries you're already winning.

Get started free Get in touch